What is the advice given for applying security by obscurity

When I first stumbled across the question “What is the advice given for applying security by obscurity”, I was a bit lost. Back in my early cybersecurity learning days, the phrase sounded like something pulled straight out of a textbook. 

Honestly, it confused me. Was it something good? Something bad? Or just another fancy term that people throw around in information security circles?

I remember asking a senior colleague about it during my internship. He laughed, leaned back in his chair, and said, “Hiding your login page behind a secret URL is fine, but if that’s all you’ve got, you’re in trouble.” That one sentence stuck with me because it was practical and real. It showed me that security by obscurity has its place but only if you understand its limits.

So, in this article, we’re going to explore what is the advice given for applying security by obscurity, why this concept sparks so much debate, and how you can navigate it in your cybersecurity journey. 

We’ll unpack expert opinions, real world examples, and even touch on some fun internet culture like the classic security by obscurity meme. My goal is to make this both informative and relatable, so let’s dive in.

What is Security by Obscurity?

Before we talk about the advice, we need a shared understanding of what this term even means. Security by obscurity refers to the practice of relying on secrecy such as hidden configurations, unpublished system details, or non standard setups to keep attackers out.

Think of it like hiding your house key under a rock in the garden. For a while, it may work, especially if no one suspects that rock is the hiding spot. But once someone discovers it, your entire security strategy crumbles.

This is why many experts argue that security through obscurity is not security. It might provide a thin layer of protection, but it is not strong enough to stand alone. And yet, if applied properly as part of a defense in depth strategy, it can play a role in slowing down attackers or reducing exposure.

The Debate: Is Security Through Obscurity Good or Bad?

People often look up ‘What is the advice given for applying security by obscurity’ because opinions in the cybersecurity community are split. You’ll find long debates in forums, including discussions on security through obscurity Reddit, where professionals go back and forth about whether it’s ever a valid approach.

On one hand, critics argue that security through obscurity is not an answer. They point to the principle that real security should be based on transparency, peer review, and strong cryptographic methods. In fact, as one well known quote puts it, security through obscurity is simply institutionalized ignorance dressed up with enthusiasm.

On the other hand, some experts say obscurity has its uses. If attackers don’t know your system version, can’t see your error messages, or can’t easily find your login page, you’ve made their job harder. In practical situations, even small obstacles can make a difference.

So the real question becomes: how do we apply obscurity wisely without depending on it?

What is the Advice Given for Applying Security by Obscurity

Now let’s address the core question head on: what is the advice given for applying security by obscurity? The consistent recommendation from experts is:

Never rely on obscurity as your only defense. Instead, use it as one small layer within a broader security architecture design.

Here’s what that means in practice:

• Use obscurity to hide unnecessary system details. For example, don’t reveal your server version in HTTP headers.
  
• Avoid exposing detailed error messages to the public, since they can reveal weaknesses.
  
• Hide admin interfaces or critical tools behind obscure URLs but protect them with strong access control mechanisms too.
  
• Combine obscurity with proven measures like encryption, patch management, and regular penetration testing methodologies.
  

In other words, obscurity can make an attacker’s job harder, but it cannot replace the foundations of cybersecurity best practices.

Security by Obscurity Pros and Cons

Let’s break down the security by obscurity pros and cons, because understanding both sides helps you apply it correctly.

Pros:

• Extra hurdle for attackers: Even if small, it slows down automated scans.
  
• Reduces casual discovery: Hidden details mean fewer opportunities for random attackers.
  
• Cheap to implement: Sometimes just changing a URL path is quick and low cost.
  

Cons:

• False sense of security: If you think obscurity is enough, you’re at risk.
  
• Breaks when exposed: Once discovered, the entire layer becomes useless.
  
• Not scalable: Doesn’t hold up against targeted or professional attacks.

The advice, then, is to embrace the pros without falling into the trap of the cons.

Security by Obscurity Example

Here’s a simple security by obscurity example: 

At first, attackers won’t know it exists. That’s obscurity. But if they run a crawler or find leaked documentation, the secret is gone. If the dashboard also lacks proper authentication or multi-factor login, the company is toast.

This is why obscurity works only if it’s combined with strong authentication, proper logging, and secure information security principles.

Security Through Obscurity in Real Life

I’ve seen obscurity fail and succeed in different projects. Once, during a university project, my team built a web app that hid certain functions behind secret routes. We thought we were clever. Within minutes, our professor who played the role of a penetration tester found the routes and exploited them. Lesson learned: obscurity alone is fragile.

On the flip side, I’ve also worked at a fintech startup where they used obscurity smartly. Error messages were sanitized, admin URLs were hidden, and system banners were disabled. None of these were the main defense, but they created useful friction against automated bots. That’s the balance experts recommend.

How Effective is Security by Obscurity?

So, how effective is security by obscurity? The answer: effective only in combination with other defenses. On its own, it’s weak. But layered with threat modeling approaches, vulnerability disclosure policies, and security compliance frameworks, it becomes another piece of the puzzle.

Think of it like frosting on a cake. It adds some sweetness, but you can’t call it a cake without the actual layers underneath.

Best Practices and Implementation Guidelines

If you’re wondering about security by obscurity implementation guidelines, here are some actionable steps:

• Hide unnecessary technical details in system responses.
  
• Use non standard ports or endpoints but back them with proper access control mechanisms.
  
• Regularly test hidden features through penetration testing methodologies.
  
• Pair obscurity with encryption, monitoring, and logging.
  
• Document your approach within security architecture design instead of leaving it undocumented.
  

These are the kinds of security by obscurity recommendations experts emphasize.

Common Misconceptions and Memes

It’s hard to talk about this concept without acknowledging internet humor. The classic security by obscurity meme often shows someone locking a door but leaving the window wide open. It’s funny because it reflects reality. Obscurity without substance is pointless.

Another misconception is the question “Is security through obscurity good?” The simple answer is no, not on its own. But yes, it can be a useful complement.

FAQs

Q: What guidance do experts give on applying security by obscurity?

A: The advice is not to rely on it as your only defense. Use it as a small supporting layer within a larger defense in depth strategy.

Q: When to use security by obscurity?

A: Use it to reduce information leakage, hide sensitive endpoints, or minimize exposure, but never as your primary protection.

Q: How effective is security by obscurity in cybersecurity?

A: It is moderately effective as a delay tactic but fails as a standalone method. Pair it with strong authentication, encryption, and compliance.

Q: What is a security by obscurity example?

A: Hiding your admin panel at a secret URL is one example. But without strong login security, this quickly fails once discovered.

Q: Why do experts say security through obscurity is not security?

A: Because secrecy alone cannot stop determined attackers. Real security comes from proven methods, transparency, and layered defenses.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, the answer to “What is the advice given for applying security by obscurity” is simple but powerful: don’t depend on it alone. Use obscurity wisely, pair it with cybersecurity best practices, and let it serve as an additional layer within a defense in depth strategy.

From my own journey, I learned that obscurity can be helpful but never sufficient. Imagine it as putting your house key in a hidden spot. It might keep the casual passerby out, but it won’t stop a determined burglar. Combine it with real locks, alarms, and strong doors, and now you have true protection.

Checkout our related post: What is Commercial Distribution Finance Guide